Y see their manuscripts are nonetheless awaiting assignment on the website, they start out sending e mails why they may be not being processed additional. Therefore responding to these e mails adds to the workload. After formatting, these manuscripts are then uploaded around the technique once more and now they’re prepared to be sent for external evaluation. Even at this stage a few of 
these manuscripts require some editing and corrections however the KDM5-IN-1 chemical information authors don’t know about this added work which the editorial group has to execute. External Peer Overview: We have more than two hundred fifty individuals on our reviewer’s information base within the country and overseas. Some of them, particularlyoverseas reviewers are really specialist in doing on-line reviews, hence they may be sent the manuscripts by means of e journal method but other people are sent by way of e mails with attachments along with the reviewers Performa. Among the reviewers in Pakistan about would nonetheless like to receive the print copies for critique and we’ve got no solution but to oblige them as they all do this honorary. It can be not uncommon that one particular has to send repeated reminders for the reviewers as a vast majority of them won’t respond inside the provided time. Some of them specifically reviewers in Pakistan at instances even misplace the manuscripts and they’ve to be sent manuscripts once again to some by e mail and to other people printed copy in the manuscripts. Our efforts continue to increase the Reviewers information base and consist of those reviewers who can do electronic critique and hope to switchover to complete electronic reviewing within the next six months. Till then we’ve got to work with each these systems. Our encounter with young faculty members has been really fantastic, they are keen, enthusiastic and do a superb job in time. Some authors who have published some manuscripts and their manuscripts are rated of good high quality are also invited to join the reviewers data base and we’ve got located it a great source of inducting new reviewers from Pakistan too as overseas. In some instances, we also give the alternative towards the authors to recommend at the least two reviewers and sometimes do utilize their services especially in these specialties in which we do not have quite a few or perhaps a couple of reviewers. Quick track processing facility: At occasions the authors are seriously faced with an emergency predicament just like the postgraduates who may have to sit in the fellowship examination and requirements published paper to be eligible or somebody has to appear in an interview for faculty position and requires published manuscripts. In some other cases a person may have to have additional published papers to turn out to be eligible for further faculty promotion. As the peer overview takes atleast 4 months time and regardless of greatest efforts we have not however been in a position to decrease this processing time, we’ve supplied the facility of quick track processing for those authors who need early publication. They’ve to pay further processing fee but it will not guarantee acceptance or early publication which can be made clear to them. They’re promised to PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17957250?dopt=Abstract get their manuscripts peer reviewed within 
eight weeks time and also the reviewers comments are conveyed to them within this time. It is determined by the top quality of their manuscript; it might be accepted, rejected or asked to revise it. In principle, we do not encourage authors to choose speedy track processing unless it can be extremelyPak J Med SciNo. pjms.pkShaukat Ali Jawaidessential. We have also noted that sometimes some authors have a tendency to misuse this facility. In spite of the truth that they have no such urgency, just to get their m.Y see their manuscripts are nonetheless awaiting assignment around the website, they start out sending e mails why they’re not being processed further. Hence responding to these e mails adds for the workload. Soon after formatting, these manuscripts are then uploaded around the program once again and now they are prepared to become sent for external critique. Even at this stage some of these manuscripts require some editing and corrections however the authors do not know about this further function which the editorial team has to carry out. External Peer Critique: We have more than two hundred fifty individuals on our reviewer’s data base inside the nation and overseas. A few of them, particularlyoverseas reviewers are really expert in performing on the web evaluations, hence they are sent the manuscripts via e journal method but other people are sent via e mails with attachments as well as the reviewers Performa. Amongst the reviewers in Pakistan about would still prefer to acquire the print copies for critique and we have no choice but to oblige them as they all do this honorary. It is not uncommon that a single has to send repeated reminders for the reviewers as a vast majority of them will not respond within the given time. Some of them especially reviewers in Pakistan at times even misplace the manuscripts and they have to be sent manuscripts once more to some by e mail and to others printed copy in the manuscripts. Our efforts continue to raise the Reviewers information base and contain these reviewers who can do electronic overview and hope to switchover to complete electronic reviewing inside the next six months. Till then we’ve got to use each these systems. Our experience with young faculty members has been extremely great, they’re keen, enthusiastic and do a great job in time. Some authors who’ve published several manuscripts and their manuscripts are rated of very good good quality are also invited to join the reviewers information base and we’ve got found it an excellent supply of inducting new reviewers from Pakistan too as overseas. In some situations, we also give the choice to the authors to recommend at the least two reviewers and at times do make use of their solutions particularly in these specialties in which we don’t have numerous or perhaps a few reviewers. Quickly track processing facility: At times the authors are truly faced with an emergency scenario just like the postgraduates who may have to sit in the fellowship examination and demands published paper to be eligible or somebody has to appear in an interview for faculty position and desires published manuscripts. In some other cases an individual may well want extra published papers to turn into eligible for further faculty promotion. As the peer assessment requires atleast four months time and regardless of best efforts we have not but been capable to reduce this processing time, we’ve GS-5816 chemical information presented the facility of rapidly track processing for those authors who want early publication. They’ve to pay additional processing fee however it doesn’t assure acceptance or early publication that is created clear to them. They may be promised to PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17957250?dopt=Abstract get their manuscripts peer reviewed inside eight weeks time and the reviewers comments are conveyed to them within this time. It is determined by the high-quality of their manuscript; it might be accepted, rejected or asked to revise it. In principle, we do not encourage authors to go for quick track processing unless it can be extremelyPak J Med SciNo. pjms.pkShaukat Ali Jawaidessential. We have also noted that from time to time some authors possess a tendency to misuse this facility. Despite the fact that they have no such urgency, simply to get their m.
