Share this post on:

M: N Age months (imply) MA mean . monthsDawson and Galpert,Autism: N Age years DL High,LowTiegerman and Primavera,Autism: N Age years Low DLTiegerman and Primavera,Could Volume ArticleAutism: N Age years Low DLBeing Imitated in ASDTABLE Continued NTypeLength of session SF session min SF modified paradigm: 4 phases SF: First stillface IP: Imitation phase SF: Second stillface PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581242 SP: Spontaneous play phase Unfamiliar experimenter SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was distinctive in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimenter Social Focus (seeking at adult’s face) Motor activity and stereotypies Social responsiveness (silence,touching,distance from adult) Social attention (searching at an individual) Social responsiveness (constructive facial expressions,damaging facial expressions,social gestures,close proximity,touch). The frequency of looking at a person,negative facial expressions,social gestures,close proximity,and touch behaviors was significantly higher in SF than in SF just after the imitation phase Type of experimental procedure and familiarity of imitative companion Target behaviors ResultsContaldo et al.ParticipantsNadel et alAutism: N Age preschooler Low DLFrontiers in Psychology www.frontiersin.org SF session min The frequency of motor activity was lower and the frequency of touching behavior was higher in SF vs. SF in the Imitation group. A reduction in distance from the adult was observed in both groups. A reduce in silence (or increase in sounds) was observed within the Food green 3 Contingent group. The frequency of seeking at adult was higher in SF vs. SF only in the Contingent group. No effect on stereotypies. SF sessions min SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was various in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimenter Social attention (searching at adult) Social responsiveness (vocalizingsmiling,becoming closetouching adult,engaging in reciprocal play) Autistic behaviors (stereotypies,playing alone,inactivity) Object play behavior Imitation recognition The frequency of looking,vocalizingsmiling,touching,and engaging in reciprocal play increased from pre to post intervention extra inside the Imitation than within the Contingent group. A reduction in Autistic behaviors (playing alone and inactivity),a rise in Object play behavior and in imitation recognition have been observed from pre to postintervention a lot more inside the Imitation than in Contingent Condition group. Social consideration (looking at adult) Novel object play behaviors Imitation ability Children in the Imitation group vs. those within the Contingent group showed greater frequency of hunting and novel object play behaviors in the course of the imitation phase. Youngsters inside the Imitation group showed larger frequency of hunting and imitation behaviors than those in the contingent group inside the SP phase. Social focus and responsiveness (Touch,Appear and Request) Imitation ability SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was distinctive in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimenter Considerable raise in Social behaviors from SF to SF for kids within the Imitation Situation group,but not for children inside the Contingent Situation group. A substantial boost in Social behaviors was also discovered within the SP phase following the second session. (Continued) SF sessions min SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was different in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimente.

Share this post on:

Author: DNA_ Alkylatingdna