Share this post on:

Can be seen, for the two systems without NPs, during the simulation time, initial disordered structures formed partly ordered b-sheet oligomers, and in the last 50 ns the b-sheet size with the largest content are 97.47 (size 4) and 67.5 (size 7), respectively, suggesting that the IAPP22?8 peptide has an obvious tendency for self-assembly and forming b-sheet-rich oligomers. When C60 was added, the size of dominant oligomers was reduced to two (73.74 ) and six (81.04 ) for four and eight IAPP peptides, respectively. Therefore, the addition of C60 is also bad for the bsheet-rich aggregation of IAPP22?8, but in a much smaller degree compared with graphene and SWCNT. In addition, most residues of hIAPP22?8 are hydrophobic, and it is well established that the 58-49-1 web hydrophobic interaction is a major get Sermorelin driving force for the b-sheet aggregation of NFGAIL (IAPP22?7)[47,50,52,55]. Therefore, in order to confirm this point in IAPP22?28 aggragation, we investigated the side-chain contacts of hydrophobic residues between different chains. In the contact map of hydrophobic reisdues (Figure 10), the different color means the different contact probability during the last 50 ns simulation. For each system with 4 or 8 peptides, the largest contact number of 4 and 8 peptides without NPs is considered as 1.0 for reference, respectively. As can be seen, there are obvious contacts between hydrophobic residues in each system, especially F23 in systems with 4 peptides. Furthermore, in both two sets, the hydrophobic side-chains have the largest probability to contact with each other if there is no NP, which indicates that hydrophobic interactions play key roles in the oligomerization of hIAPP22?8 and the carbon NPs can 1315463 weaken the hydrophobic interactions between peptides. In other words, as hydrophobic interactions can benefit hIAPP22?28 oligomerization, the NPs especially graphene and SWCNT can inhibit the aggregation of hIAPP22?8 peptides by blocking these beneficial interactions. The results from our work show that the adsorption of graphene or SWCNT for peptides has a competitive advantage compared with the interaction between peptides. Furthermore, graphene and SWCNT can inhibit the formation of ordered b-sheet-rich oligomers of IAPP22?8 and make peptides prefer to adopt random structure, while due to its small size C60 has a much weaker effects. Therefore, the fibrillation of IAPP22?8 fragment may be inhibited at its early stage by graphene or SWCNT. However, so far there exist two opposite opinions on the question_whether carbon nanoparticles accelerate or inhibit the formation of amyloid. Zheng et al. [56] support the view that the graphite surface can accelerate the aggregation of Ab peptides into fibrils. Their results showed that hydrophobic graphite induced the quick adsorption of Ab peptides regardless of their initial conformations and sizes, and Ab peptides prefered to adopt random structure for monomers and remained b-rich-structure for small oligomers, but not helical structures. They also found that hydrophobic C-terminal residues of Ab formed preferential interactions with the graphite surface to facilitate Ab fibril formation and fibril growth. On the contrary, a recent experimental study [18] showed that graphene oxide strongly inhibited Ab fibrillation by delaying the Ab fibrillation process via adsorption of Ab monomers. In addition, another researchInfluence of Nanoparticle on Amyloid FormationFigure 8. Probability distribution of the minimum.Can be seen, for the two systems without NPs, during the simulation time, initial disordered structures formed partly ordered b-sheet oligomers, and in the last 50 ns the b-sheet size with the largest content are 97.47 (size 4) and 67.5 (size 7), respectively, suggesting that the IAPP22?8 peptide has an obvious tendency for self-assembly and forming b-sheet-rich oligomers. When C60 was added, the size of dominant oligomers was reduced to two (73.74 ) and six (81.04 ) for four and eight IAPP peptides, respectively. Therefore, the addition of C60 is also bad for the bsheet-rich aggregation of IAPP22?8, but in a much smaller degree compared with graphene and SWCNT. In addition, most residues of hIAPP22?8 are hydrophobic, and it is well established that the hydrophobic interaction is a major driving force for the b-sheet aggregation of NFGAIL (IAPP22?7)[47,50,52,55]. Therefore, in order to confirm this point in IAPP22?28 aggragation, we investigated the side-chain contacts of hydrophobic residues between different chains. In the contact map of hydrophobic reisdues (Figure 10), the different color means the different contact probability during the last 50 ns simulation. For each system with 4 or 8 peptides, the largest contact number of 4 and 8 peptides without NPs is considered as 1.0 for reference, respectively. As can be seen, there are obvious contacts between hydrophobic residues in each system, especially F23 in systems with 4 peptides. Furthermore, in both two sets, the hydrophobic side-chains have the largest probability to contact with each other if there is no NP, which indicates that hydrophobic interactions play key roles in the oligomerization of hIAPP22?8 and the carbon NPs can 1315463 weaken the hydrophobic interactions between peptides. In other words, as hydrophobic interactions can benefit hIAPP22?28 oligomerization, the NPs especially graphene and SWCNT can inhibit the aggregation of hIAPP22?8 peptides by blocking these beneficial interactions. The results from our work show that the adsorption of graphene or SWCNT for peptides has a competitive advantage compared with the interaction between peptides. Furthermore, graphene and SWCNT can inhibit the formation of ordered b-sheet-rich oligomers of IAPP22?8 and make peptides prefer to adopt random structure, while due to its small size C60 has a much weaker effects. Therefore, the fibrillation of IAPP22?8 fragment may be inhibited at its early stage by graphene or SWCNT. However, so far there exist two opposite opinions on the question_whether carbon nanoparticles accelerate or inhibit the formation of amyloid. Zheng et al. [56] support the view that the graphite surface can accelerate the aggregation of Ab peptides into fibrils. Their results showed that hydrophobic graphite induced the quick adsorption of Ab peptides regardless of their initial conformations and sizes, and Ab peptides prefered to adopt random structure for monomers and remained b-rich-structure for small oligomers, but not helical structures. They also found that hydrophobic C-terminal residues of Ab formed preferential interactions with the graphite surface to facilitate Ab fibril formation and fibril growth. On the contrary, a recent experimental study [18] showed that graphene oxide strongly inhibited Ab fibrillation by delaying the Ab fibrillation process via adsorption of Ab monomers. In addition, another researchInfluence of Nanoparticle on Amyloid FormationFigure 8. Probability distribution of the minimum.

Share this post on:

Author: DNA_ Alkylatingdna