Ansactivation in a dose-dependent manner. PPC-1 cells were transfected with 50 ng of AR, 250 ng of ARA70 and increasing concentration (250, 500, and 1000 ng) of COUP-TF II expression vector. Cells were treated with or without 3 nM DHT for 24 h. At least three independent experiments were combined and values represent the mean6SEM. *, P,0.05;**, P,0.01; ***, P,0.001. doi:10.1371/buy NT 157 journal.pone.0049026.gAcknowledgmentsWe thank Dr. E. M. Wilson for kindly providing us the VP-AR1-660, GAL-AR624-919, and 5XGAL4-Luc3 plasmids.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: CS HJL KL. Performed the experiments: CS HJL EP. Analyzed the data: CS HJL KL. Wrote the paper: CS HJL KL.
Influenza continues to pose a global health Hesperidin web problem, as highlighted by the 2009 swine influenza pandemic and sporadic human infections with avian H5N1 influenza viruses. Antigenic changes in influenza virus, primarily in the surface antigens hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), are referred to as antigenic shift (subtype changes by reassortment) and antigenic drift (mutation). This variability among influenza viruses hinders vaccination efforts. Currently, annual surveillance is necessary to identify circulating viral strains for use in vaccine production. New vaccines are often required, and take about 6 months to become available [1]. Thus new approaches are needed. In contrast, so-called “universal” vaccines targeting relatively conserved components of influenza virus can provide protection regardless of strain or subtype of virus, and may provide an alternative to the use of traditional vaccines. This immunity to conserved antigens would not necessarily prevent infection completely, but might decrease severity of disease, speed up viral clearance, and reduce morbidity and mortality during the initial stages of an outbreak until strain-matched vaccine becameavailable [2]. Furthermore, vaccines based on T cell immunity could be used in combination with a seasonal vaccine to improve efficacy, especially in the elderly who are at high risk of severe disease and show reduced responses to current flu vaccines. Peptide scanning of T cell responses of healthy human individuals has shown that matrix 1 (M1) and nucleoprotein (NP) are among the prominent targets of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell cross-recognition [3], so they are of interest as vaccine candidates. By sequence homology, NP is .90 conserved among influenza A isolates [4]. Both murine [5] and human [6] cytotoxic T lymphocytes induced by NP of one virus strain have been shown to cross-react with NP from different influenza A strains. The strong immune responses to NP in mice contribute to protection against challenge [7] via CD8+ T cells [5,8], as well as contributions from CD4+ cells [9,10] and antibodies [11?3]. The influenza A matrix (M) gene encodes two highly conserved proteins: an ion channel protein, M2, and the capsid protein, M1. M1 is not a major protective antigen in the mouse and is not well recognized by mouse T cells [14], but has long been known to be recognized byHighly Immunogenic Simian Adenovirus Vectorhuman T cells [15]. Thus its potential contribution to vaccine protection may be underestimated by mouse studies. While epitopes providing targets widely shared among influenza viruses have been identified in multiple viral proteins, not all of them are highly immunogenic when presented by classical vaccines. More potent immunization can be achieved using recombinant vectors to express th.Ansactivation in a dose-dependent manner. PPC-1 cells were transfected with 50 ng of AR, 250 ng of ARA70 and increasing concentration (250, 500, and 1000 ng) of COUP-TF II expression vector. Cells were treated with or without 3 nM DHT for 24 h. At least three independent experiments were combined and values represent the mean6SEM. *, P,0.05;**, P,0.01; ***, P,0.001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049026.gAcknowledgmentsWe thank Dr. E. M. Wilson for kindly providing us the VP-AR1-660, GAL-AR624-919, and 5XGAL4-Luc3 plasmids.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: CS HJL KL. Performed the experiments: CS HJL EP. Analyzed the data: CS HJL KL. Wrote the paper: CS HJL KL.
Influenza continues to pose a global health problem, as highlighted by the 2009 swine influenza pandemic and sporadic human infections with avian H5N1 influenza viruses. Antigenic changes in influenza virus, primarily in the surface antigens hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), are referred to as antigenic shift (subtype changes by reassortment) and antigenic drift (mutation). This variability among influenza viruses hinders vaccination efforts. Currently, annual surveillance is necessary to identify circulating viral strains for use in vaccine production. New vaccines are often required, and take about 6 months to become available [1]. Thus new approaches are needed. In contrast, so-called “universal” vaccines targeting relatively conserved components of influenza virus can provide protection regardless of strain or subtype of virus, and may provide an alternative to the use of traditional vaccines. This immunity to conserved antigens would not necessarily prevent infection completely, but might decrease severity of disease, speed up viral clearance, and reduce morbidity and mortality during the initial stages of an outbreak until strain-matched vaccine becameavailable [2]. Furthermore, vaccines based on T cell immunity could be used in combination with a seasonal vaccine to improve efficacy, especially in the elderly who are at high risk of severe disease and show reduced responses to current flu vaccines. Peptide scanning of T cell responses of healthy human individuals has shown that matrix 1 (M1) and nucleoprotein (NP) are among the prominent targets of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell cross-recognition [3], so they are of interest as vaccine candidates. By sequence homology, NP is .90 conserved among influenza A isolates [4]. Both murine [5] and human [6] cytotoxic T lymphocytes induced by NP of one virus strain have been shown to cross-react with NP from different influenza A strains. The strong immune responses to NP in mice contribute to protection against challenge [7] via CD8+ T cells [5,8], as well as contributions from CD4+ cells [9,10] and antibodies [11?3]. The influenza A matrix (M) gene encodes two highly conserved proteins: an ion channel protein, M2, and the capsid protein, M1. M1 is not a major protective antigen in the mouse and is not well recognized by mouse T cells [14], but has long been known to be recognized byHighly Immunogenic Simian Adenovirus Vectorhuman T cells [15]. Thus its potential contribution to vaccine protection may be underestimated by mouse studies. While epitopes providing targets widely shared among influenza viruses have been identified in multiple viral proteins, not all of them are highly immunogenic when presented by classical vaccines. More potent immunization can be achieved using recombinant vectors to express th.
