L ethics. Two intense views clash those represented by supporters of “code ethics” and these represented by the adherents of “no-code ethics” . Opponents of your codification of ethics  normally formulate three accusation claims: deontologism, conventionalism and opportunism. The initial a single is based around the statement that planet in the values and duties won’t ever be transformed into neat manual from the moral conduct. The code of ethics reduces the problem with the duty to the obedience to norms. Evaluation criterion is Uridine 5′-monophosphate disodium salt cost established as carrying out one’s duties, rather than private reflection or examination of one’s conscience. The second claim comes out from the statement that the morality is one thing independent with the convention and contract, and specialist ethics is inseparably connected with it. Producing a code causes the problem ofeJIFCC2014Vol25No2pp199-Elbieta Puacz, Waldemar Glusiec, Barbara Madej-Czerwonka Polish Code of Ethics of a Health-related Laboratory Specialistestablishing requirements in professional ethics: who and by what criteria is supposed to appoint these norms A sign of opportunistic character ascribed to supporters of codes is expediential dimension of these documents. Elaborating codes ordinarily serves a specific occupational group rather than develops a broad and impartial moral reflection. In a response to accusations of supporters of “no-code ethics” opposite arguments are place forward. Firstly, they underline that obedience towards the code is under no circumstances discharging an individual from moral responsibility. Secondly, the norm integrated in the code, irrespective of your convention in which it was created, is also sensitizing the employee for the moral dimension of action to which this norm refers to. Thirdly, codes of ethics extremely usually appeal to anti-pragmatic category of dignity. It’s tough to accuse these documents of exclusively financial character and to assign to them only praxeological function. It can be doable also to dismiss the accusation with the opportunism by filling the elementary requirement place prior to each and every code of ethics, i.e. protecting the social welfare. Accurate concern concerning the society as a entire protects in the predicament in which the organization of a given occupational group will turn into the only grounds for making the code . Inside the light of this discussion it is actually attainable to express two significant conclusions. It is actually tough to visualize professional ethics devoid of clearly defined principles and duties and these are most typically expressed in the kind of norms from the code. This doesn’t imply although that the complete region of specialist ethics is reduced and is contained in these documents. Art. 27 of CEMLS accurately emphasizes it: “this Code of Ethics of a Health-related Laboratory Specialist could be the collection of basic ethical standards that need to be followed by every representative with the profession” . Secondly, codes ought to not grow to be a “legalization of ethics”. Contrarily, the point is Pagethat norms included in codes are rooted within the worth systems of your community. This rooting of CEMLS is explained in the preamble: ,,The Code of Ethics on the Health-related Laboratory Specialist is grounded in normally PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345631 accepted ethical standards also because the principles originating from the specialist tradition” . Concern about “legalization of ethics” in CEMLS is dispelled by Art. 28-29: ,,This Code of Ethics of a Healthcare Laboratory Specialist will be the supply of moral guidelines and does not replace the process of a.