Entrations had been not statistically significant (Table one). The average Mg concentration ranged from 136 mg kg-1 (FYM) to 164 mg kg-1 (FYM NPK2). Mean Ca concentrations ranged from 2802 mg kg-1 (FYM NPK2) to 3777 mg kg-1 (FYM). Imply soil pH was not significantly diverse CFT8634 manufacturer between fertilizer therapies and ranged from 6.51 (FYM N2) to 6.85 (FYM). Similarly, the concentrations of Cox and Ntot were not substantially various between fertilization treatment options and ranged from one.17 (Manage) to 1.29 (FYM NPK2) for Cox and from 0.15 (Control) to 0.17 (FYM NPK2) for Ntot (Table three). 2.three.two. Ivanovice The P concentration in Ivanovice was considerably dependent over the fertilization treatment, with statistically distinctive values in each fertilization remedy (Table 2). The lowest values were recorded in the unfertilized Manage (66 mg kg-1 , appropriate), followed by FYM N2 (117 mg kg-1 , substantial), FYM (169 mg kg-1 , higher) plus the highest concentration was during the FYM NPK2 treatment method (226 mg kg-1 , very high). Exactly the same condition occurred from the situation of K. The lowest concentration was Moveltipril Inhibitor measured in Control (181 mg kg-1 ), followed by FYM N2 (288 mg kg-1 ), FYM (370 mg kg-1 ) and FYM NPK2 (447 mg kg-1 ). Statistically significant variations have been recorded in between the Handle (A), FYM N2 (B) and FYM (C) treatments collectively with FYM NPK2 (C) (Table two, fertilizer remedies followed from the identical letter are statistically insignificant). As while in the preceding case, fertilizer application had no substantial effect on Mg and Ca concentrations, the distinctions were not statistically significant. The results of soil analyses for these two factors are proven in Table 2.Plants 2021, ten,7 ofTable 3. The extended erm impact of fertilization within the worth of soil pH, Cox and Ntot material. pH (KCl) Caslav Manage FYM FYM N2 FYM NPK2 Ivanovice Handle FYM FYM N2 FYM NPK2 Lukavec Management FYM FYM N2 FYM NPK2 6.57 0.03 A six.85 0.14 A 6.51 0.07 A 6.53 0.17 A six.58 0.14 A 6.69 0.08 A 6.62 0.14 A six.63 0.11 A five.84 0.06 A 5.88 0.12 A five.74 0.08 A 5.83 0.05 A Cox one.17 0.06 A 1.twenty 0.05 A one.20 0.05 A one.29 0.09 A 1.67 0.03 A one.92 0.06 B one.95 0.03 B 2.07 0.05 B 1.41 0.05 A one.72 0.06 AB 1.72 0.03 AB one.82 0.13 B Ntot 0.15 0.01 A 0.15 0.01 A 0.16 0.01 A 0.17 0.01 A 0.20 0.01 A 0.23 0.01 A 0.23 0.01 A 0.24 0.01 A 0.19 0.01 A 0.23 0.01 B 0.23 0.01 B 0.23 0.01 BThe imply values ( tandard error) followed through the similar letter (A –vertically–comparing the fertilizer therapies) are not statistically different (p 0.05).Soil pH was not affected by fertilization and ranged from 6.58 (Handle) to six.69 (FYM), Table three. The Cox information was appreciably affected by fertilization. The lowest concentration was measured in Manage (one.67 ), which was statistically considerably reduce than inside the other therapies, which have been not appreciably unique from every other. Cox concentrations in these treatment options ranged from 1.92 (FYM) to 2.07 (FYM NPK2). From the situation of Ntot, we did not record statistically major distinctions between the solutions and ranged from 0.twenty (Management) to 0.24 (FYM NPK2), Table 3. 2.three.3. Lukavec In Lukavac, the lowest P concentration was recorded within the Management (44 mg kg-1 ), which was statistically comparable towards the worth of 46 mg kg-1 (FYM N2). A greater P concentration was measured while in the FYM treatment (90 mg kg-1 ), which offered a statistically appreciably decrease yield than FYM N2 (Table 2), and consequently we assume that P originating from FYM was not absolutely utilized.
