Rnary binders currently pointed out, the diffusion coefficient was lower at 250 days in comparison with reference mortars. Lastly, at that last age, L mortars presented the highest value of this coefficient.three.three. Water absorption The outcomes of water absorption after immersion are depicted in Figure four. A slight lower with time of this parameter was noted for each of the mortars studied. Normally, eight of handful of differences in between the analyzed binders have been observed at 28 and 250 days regard- 19 ing the water absorption just after immersion.AbsorptionMaterials 2021, 14,Absorption following immersion,ten 8 six 4 228d 250d28d 250d 28d 250d28d 250d28d 250d28d 250d28d 250dMaterials 2021, 14, 5937 REFLSFSLSFFL9 ofFigure four. Results of absorption soon after immersion noted for the Etiocholanolone References studied series. Figure four. Final results of absorption after immersion noted for the studied series.three.4. Steady-State Chloride Diffusion CoefficientDiffusion coef.Cl Diffusion coef., x-28d250dREFThe benefits of steady-state chloride diffusion coefficient obtained from sample’s re28d sistivity for the analyzed mortars can be observed in Figure 5. All the binary and ternary 28d 28d binders studied showed higher values of this parameter at 28 days in comparison with the ref28d erence specimens. The highest diffusion coefficients at that age have been noted for F and L 28d series, followed by the three ternary binders analyzed (SL, SF, and FL series). On the 28d other hand, the lowest 28-days value of this parameter for mortars with additions cor250d responded for the S series. Amongst 28 and 250 days, the diffusion coefficient decreased for all the mortars studied, and this reduction was much more noticeable for all those which incorporate no less than 1 active addition within the binder (S, F, SF, SL, and FL series). The lowest coefficient at 250 days was noted for F and SF mortars, closely followed by S and FL ones, Tenidap site whilst it was slightly larger for SL series. In250d addition, for each of the binary and ternary binders currently described, the diffusion coefficient was decrease at 250 days in comparison 250d 250d with reference mortars. Lastly, at that final age, L mortars presented the highest worth of 250d 250d this coefficient.L S F SL SF FL-m /sFigure five. Steady-state chloride diffusion coefficient results obtained for the analyzed mortars. Figure five. Steady-state chloride diffusion coefficient final results obtained for the analyzed mortars.three.five. Carbonation Front Depth three.five. Carbonation Front Depth The depths of carbonation front obtained forfor the studied bindersrepresented in the depths of carbonation front obtained the studied binders are are represented in Figure Reference mortars showed the lowest carbonation front depths at 28 days, folFigure six. 6. Reference mortars showed the lowest carbonation front depths at 28 days, followed by ones, whereas these depths werewere higher for the other binders studied, lowed by S S ones, whereas these depths larger for the other binders studied, but but with slight variations between them. From 28 todays,days, the carbonation depths with slight variations amongst them. From 28 to 250 250 the carbonation depths inincreased for all the analyzed mortars.250 days, this parameter was again decrease for REFfor creased for each of the analyzed mortars. At At 250 days, this parameter was once more reduced REF series, compared to the binders with additions. The highest carbonation depths that series, in comparison to the binders with additions. The highest carbonation depths at at that age had been noted for the binary binders, par.
