Ent when all B-scans are incorporated (Figure three, to the true approach a array of the width of about 5 . The approximation for the accurate imply (N ) for dentin of tooth whenIn Figure 4a , an example of semi-automatic 3D Sutezolid In Vivo exemplarily becomes apparent 45). all B-scans are incorporated (Figure 3, exemplarily forsegmentation of 45). tooth omposite interface isof semi-automatic 3D segdentin of tooth the In Figure 4a , an example demonstrated. mentation of the tooth omposite interface is demonstrated.Figure 2. Cont.i. 2021, 11, Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10285 x FOR PEER REVIEW5 of5 ofFigure 2. Cont.Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR 2021, 11, 10285 Appl. Sci. PEER Review i. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW6 of 9 6 of6 ofFigure two. for for 24 (b), (a), (b), (d). Figure two. Scatter plots Scatter plots (a), teeth 134524 24 and 45 (c), and for all teethplotsThe plots show the absolute in the Figure two. Scatterteeth 13 teeth 13 (a), (c), 45 for all teethall teeth (d). Theshow the absolute deviation plots for (b), (c), and for (d). The plots show the absolute deviation with the weighted mean fraction with the interfacial gap length (enamel and dentin) from the deviation with the weighted mean length in the interfacial gap length (enamel and dentin) from the weighted mean fraction of your interfacial gapfraction(enamel and dentin) from the value working with 61 cross-sectional pictures as a worth working with 61 cross-sectional pictures as a MNITMT In Vitro function of your number of B-scans (N: 1, 3, five, 7, 9, 15, 21, function of worth applying 61 B-scans (N: 1, 3,photos as a function of theThe red dashed lines(N: 1, 3, five, 7, 9, 15, 21, selection of the amount of cross-sectional five, 7, 9, 15, 21, 45, and 61). number of B-scans indicate the (statistical) 45, and 61). The red dashed lines indicate the (statistical) array of .5 in the deviation of indicates, 45, and 61). of indicates, in comparison to 61 B-scans. Depending on the .5 from the deviation of deviation was up red dashed lines indicate .five from the deviation The61 B-scans. According to the (statistical) range ofrestoration examined, theirmeans, in comparison to the restoration examined, their deviation was up to 3 , when compared with 15 B-scans. Depending on the restoration examined, their deviation was as much as three , 61 B-scans. to three , with less significantly less than 15 B-scans. with than with much less than 15 B-scans.Figure 3. Approximation for the weighted imply fraction of interfacial gap interfacialdentin, determined by all 362based in the Figure 3. Approximation for the weighted mean fraction of length on gap length on dentin, B-scans Figure three. Approximation for the weighted mean fraction of interfacial gap length on dentin, primarily based volume scan exemplarily for tooththe volume scan exemplarily for tooth 24. The N becomes clear. on all 362 B-scans of 24. The approximation of the accurate mean with approximation in the true mean on all 362 B-scans with the volume scan exemplarily for tooth 24. The approximation in the accurate mean with N becomes clear. with N becomes clear.Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10285 ci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW7 of7 ofFigure four. cross-sectional image of tooth 13 restored 13 FbM/Amaris. Within the B-scan enamel (E), Figure 4. (a) An OCT (a) An OCT cross-sectional image of toothwithrestored with FbM/Amaris. Within the B-scandentin (D), enamel (E), dentin (D), composite (C), plus the enamel-dentin junction (EDJ) are displayed. Interfacomposite (C), and the enamel-dentin junction (EDJ) are displayed. Interfacial adhesive defects (vibrant lines, red arrow cial adhesive defects (bright lines, red arrow heads), the lengths of which.
